Why We Didn’t Go the Contract Manufacturing Route
Early on, I was offered the fast way. It's how most beauty brands start, and there's no shame in it: a contract manufacturer already has a catalog of working formulas, sitting in a warehouse, ready to go. You pick one, you put your name and your packaging on it, and a few weeks later you have a product to sell. No lab, no formulation science, no R&D timeline. It's the single biggest reason beauty has so many brands and so few actual formulas.
We looked at it seriously, because it's genuinely the responsible choice for a lot of first-time founders. And we said no. Here's what that decision actually meant, for us and for what ends up on your scalp.
What going that route would have looked like
I want to be fair to it, because contract manufacturing isn't a scam and it isn't lazy. A stock formula typically costs 15 to 25% less than a custom one, since the development and testing are already done. It can go from decision to shelf in weeks instead of the nine to twelve months a real formulation takes. Minimum order quantities are low enough that you can test whether an idea has a market before you've spent real money finding out. For a lot of brands, especially ones built around packaging, positioning, or a specific niche nobody else is serving, that's not just acceptable. It's the smart call.
The catch is the one thing that model can't give you: the formula isn't yours. The manufacturer owns it. It was built for broad appeal, not for a specific scalp or hair problem, and the brand two shelves over can be selling the exact same thing under a different label and a different price. You control the outside of the bottle. Someone else controls everything that happens inside it.
|
|
Why We Have Decided Not to Produce a Shampoo and Conditioner A different version of the same question: why we'll say no to an entire product category rather than ship something that isn't actually ours to stand behind. |
What we chose instead
We went the slower way: every formula co-developed from scratch with cosmetic scientists, tested as a whole rather than assembled from a list of ingredients that were each good in isolation. That's a real difference from picking a formula off a shelf. It means an ingredient has to earn a specific job in a specific formula, not just sound good on its own, and we've turned down ingredients we genuinely liked, amla included, because something already in the formula was doing that job.
It also means we test and sometimes reverse ourselves. We tried a vegan hydrolyzed keratin for the Nourishing Hair Oil because it was the more conscious option on paper. It didn't perform as well side by side with what we already had, so we kept the original. That's not a decision a stock formula ever makes you face, because you never get to ask the question in the first place.
|
|
Why Isn’t Amla In Our Formulations? Here’s What We Actually Ask First The actual filter a good ingredient has to clear before it makes it into a formula — and why “it's a good ingredient” has never been enough on its own. |
What that costs us internally
None of this is free, and I'd rather tell you what it costs than pretend it doesn't. A stock formula ships in weeks. Ours take nine to twelve months before they're ready, because testing and iterating with a cosmetic scientist isn't a step you can skip. We press, infuse, and distil most of our own oils in-house rather than buying them premade, which means we're managing small-batch production instead of placing one large order and waiting. And because we filter those oils mechanically instead of chemically, letting them settle for weeks instead of processing them same-day, our yield is lower and our turnaround is slower than almost anyone using the industry-standard shortcut.
Every one of those choices is less efficient than the alternative. We keep making them anyway, because the only way to control what's actually in the bottle, batch by batch, is to be the one making most of what goes into it, rather than taking a supplier's word for it.
|
|
Why Producing Our Own Oils Makes a Difference in Our Formulations The full production process this costs us: small-batch cold pressing, 72-hour infusions, steam distillation, and mechanical filtration, at every stage. |
What it means for you
It means the product in your hand wasn't picked off a shelf and relabeled. It was built for a specific job, tested until it did that job, and in large part produced by us rather than a factory we never see. You can't buy the same bottle under five other brand names, because there isn't a stock version of it anywhere to buy.
I understand the instinct to want full control over what goes on your own scalp. I lived it for years, mixing my own oils in a kitchen before Pressed existed, because I didn't trust what I couldn't see. What I learned is that the instinct was right and the method was incomplete. Buying good oils isn't the same as formulating with them. The same instinct that makes someone distrust a relabeled stock formula is the instinct that built this company. We just pointed it at a lab instead of a mixing bowl.
|
|
The DIY Scalp Oil That Started It All (And Why I Don't Make My Own Anymore) Where this all actually started for me, before Pressed existed — and the ceiling I hit mixing my own oils at home that a contract-manufactured bottle wouldn't have solved either. |
The bottom line
Contract manufacturing isn't dishonest, and plenty of good brands run on it. We just couldn't square it with what we were actually trying to build: something unique enough, and specific enough, that it had to be formulated from nothing and partly produced by our own hands to exist at all. Slower, costlier, and harder to scale. Also the only way we know to make sure that what's in the bottle is something nobody else is selling.
|
|
Scalp Elixir Eleven cold-pressed oils and botanical actives, each included at a specific concentration for a specific, explainable job — co-developed with cosmetic scientists, tested rather than eyeballed, and nowhere else to buy under a different label. |





Leave a comment